![]() The telecom later began "confidential discussions" with NorthVu in early 2004 after it acquired the technology. Canadian IT patentees should also take note that they may face very significant cost awards if they are unsuccessful in asserting overbroad patents.The suit alleges that Bell Canada first approached the patent's inventor, Ross Jeffery, with an "unsolicited request to discuss his work" back in 1999. The MediaTube v Bell decision signals that IT patents can be valuable but that they only offer protection for the invention they actually disclose. #Mediatube vs bell full#On the facts of the case, MediaTube was also ordered to pay Bell’s full legal costs in respect of an unfounded punitive damages allegation based on alleged dealings between the parties. MediaTube was ordered to pay Bell’s allowable costs with a 50% penalty to reflect the weakness of MediaTube’s infringement case, which the Court found to be based upon a contorted claim construction. No cost consequences flowed from Bell characterizing the plaintiff MediaTube in this manner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |